| Papers [1-15] of 100 :: [Page 1 of 7] | | Go to page : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 —> | Search results on "ECONOMIC INEQUALITY": |
|
|
Socio-economic Inequality, 2002.
An examination of some of the causes of the current socio-economic inequality in the world, with a focus on several philosophers and their theories.
3,472 words (approx. 13.9 pages), 12 sources, APA, $ 97.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
Inequality among human beings has been an issue of concern from times immemorial and some of the greatest thinkers in human history have sought to narrow the gap between the haves and the have-nots through their philosophy, teachings and efforts. The paper shows that, ironically, religion has contributed more towards the inequality of mankind than any other ?philosophy? in the recent past. It is not only religion however that has been responsible for the inequality. The paper shows that the whole economic and financial structure of capitalism, international financial rules and globalization is loaded in favor of the rich and has resulted in widening of the gap between the rich and the poor. We are now living in a world in which this gap is so pronounced as to be positively grotesque. The saddest part of the dilemma is that inequality in our world is increasing by the day. This essay is about the background, reasons and the present state of socioeconomic inequality. It includes a discussion of the theories of some of the leading philosophers in history who have deliberated on the issue such as Karl Marx. It examines the leading economic theory of our times?capitalism, and looks at its pros and cons. The present state of inequality in the world, the reasons behind rising inequality and its possible effects are also discussed.
From the Paper
"In the Western Christian world, inequality was accepted as a way of life due to the widespread feeling that the existing social structure based on equality was impossible to change. The early Christian Church teachings emphasized that somehow living in sin had created inequality and misery for mankind, and a life without sin would solve all injustices. It was only in the 17th and 18th century that philosophers like John Locke and Jean-Jacques Rousseau began to teach the inherent equality of man and belief in the possibility of social transformation began to spread. This was followed by the spread of socialist and communist thought that predicted social transformation and the demise of inequality through violent revolution."
| |
|
Locke and Rousseau on Economic Inequality, 2008.
A comparison of John Locke's "Second Treatise of Government" and Jean-Jacques Rousseau's "Discourse on the Origin of Inequality".
2,790 words (approx. 11.2 pages), 2 sources, MLA, $ 83.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This essay compares and contrasts two theoretical models regarding economic inequality. The first is presented by John Locke in his "Second Treatise of Government", which addresses the origins of economic inequality. The second, which is in sharp distinction to these views, is presented by French philosopher Jean-Jacques Rousseau in his "Discourse on the Origin of Inequality". The paper outlines the strengths and weaknesses of both. It argues that, while both works are very similar in their imagined origins of economic inequality in the early history of property, they differ radically in how they represent property and the justifications for its differing accumulations that ultimately give rise to economic inequality. The paper concludes that Locke envisions property and moderate levels of economic inequality as a good thing, while Rousseau condemns this inequality as a corrupting influence upon human society in every respect.
From the Paper
"However, while there is a superficial similarity between how Locke and Rousseau each conceive of the state of nature, there is one important distinction between the two: property. While Locke conceives, as noted above, of an equality of property as existing in the state of nature, Rousseau contends that the innovation of property itself marked the ending of the state of nature and the beginning of human society.
"This is an important difference, and it goes to the heart of how each philosopher conceives of economic inequality. For example, it is clear from the outset of Rousseau's description of the state of nature and its defining characteristics that he sees property as not only a negative aspect of human society but as being fundamentally illegitimate as well."
| |
|
Economic Inequality, 2004.
A discussion of the problem of disparity of wealth between the classes in America.
2,179 words (approx. 8.7 pages), 9 sources, MLA, $ 67.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper examines how America was built on the ideal that those who contribute to the nation?s economic growth should reap some of the benefits and how, over the last two decades, however, the benefits of growth have been skewed in favor of the wealthiest people. It looks at how recent changes in the economy have benefited society, bringing greater wealth and lower employment rates to the country. It attempts to analyze whether this economic growth can achieve the necessary social goals of the nation, which aim to reduce poverty and the income gap between people.
Outline
Introduction
Causes of Economic Inequality
Arguments Concerning Economic Inequality
Conclusion
From the Paper
"In the early 1980s, trade and technology resulted in a "blue-collar disaster" because families struggled to maintain "living standards only by having fewer children, putting more members to work, and running up debt" (Allen, 1999, p. 1). Many people expressed outrage that people got poorer, while the country was obviously growing richer. However, there is a simple explanation for this. Although the country?s economy was growing, but the "pieces were very unequally divided. The size of some people?s pieces were growing faster than the pie itself is growing, which means other people?s pieces had to shrink" (Watkins, 1999)."
| |
|
Economics and Inequality, 2005.
This paper discusses whether economic growth is possible without inequality.
2,250 words (approx. 9.0 pages), 5 sources, $ 89.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This essay answers the question of whether or not economic progress can take place without resulting in inequality. The writer discusses that looking at today's world and the number of wealth inequities, one is tempted to think that it is not possible, but the essay concludes that it is technically possible. However, the writer notes that since colonialism, this has grown further and further to sustain.
From the Paper
"Looking at the distribution of wealth across the world today, as well as the fact that the growth of western, 'developed' countries often seems to have occurred at the expense of less developed Asian and African countries, it would is tempting to conclude that inequality is a necessary condition for economic growth. This is based on the premise that growth in one area takes away from someone else - and certainly, this is often the case. The growth of the European economies in the fifteenth to the nineteenth centuries was built upon colonial exploitation."
| |
|
Inequality and Economic Growth, 2008.
An analysis of the relationship between inequality and national economic growth.
2,761 words (approx. 11.0 pages), 5 sources, APA, $ 82.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper discusses whether inequality is necessary for economic growth to occur. It questions whether, in low development countries, economic growth is the result of equal distribution of income and if per capital income must reach a minimum level before income inequality decreases. The paper also looks at whether countries of unequal income distributions experience slower growth than more "equal" countries. Additionally, the paper discusses whether governments should be implementing policies of redistribution in order to aid the poor.
Table of Contents:
Introduction
Common Questions & Models
Global Data - Inequality Distribution Issues
Deinger and Squire: The Third and Arguably Most Important Question
Other Macroeconomic Research
A Microeconomic Model
Conclusion
From the Paper
"One would aim for the more optimistic view that equality and economic growth are compatible, because the current global state of regional poverty is a major problem, with no clear end in sight. This impresses an importance on determining a state whereby economic growth is possible alongside a simultaneous increase in the fortunes of the world's poor. However, researchers who have viewed the issue from afar tend to conclude that "the empirical evidence of the positive impact of greater equality on efficiency is still inconclusive" (Sharpe, 2003, p. 13). In other words, it may be naive to assume equality and economic growth is possible, particularly considering that much economic growth occurs in today's world based on the global phenomenon of inequality. However, researchers also conclude that "equally, there is little conclusive evidence of major negative effects on efficiency from equality" (ibid, p. 13), meaning that a relationship between economic growth and equality may be possible. It is up to further research to determine how this can be implemented in policy."
| |
|
Gender Inequality and Economic Development in Brazil, 2006.
A review of disparities in the Brazilian workplace between men and women.
1,688 words (approx. 6.8 pages), 4 sources, MLA, $ 54.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
The paper reviews the economic status of women in Brazil. It compares employment figures from the 1970s and 1990s. The paper cites reports from Brazilian organizations for women's equality and feminism to support its claims. The paper also touches on the economic factors and their effect on infant mortality. The writer concludes that Brazilian women have a long way to go before their status approaches that of American women, but optimistically notes that some efforts are already being made to improve the situation.
From the Paper
"There are some programs in Brazil are trying to make lives better for the women, and therefore make them more equal to men. One of these programs has been established in Comunidade Solidaria. Ruth Cardoso, who is not only the wife of the President of Brazil, but she is also a sociologist , set it up."
| |
|
The Rise of Inequality in China, 2008.
An analysis of the historic development and implications for China of its growing economic inequality.
3,702 words (approx. 14.8 pages), 8 sources, MLA, $ 102.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper critically examines the issue of growing economic inequality in China. It discusses the issue in terms of its historic development and how it has shaped China today. It also describes its implications for China's future social and economic evolution and discusses the reason that this problem has been masked in the popular view of China today as an economic superpower.
Table of Contents:
Introduction
The Ideology of Equality in Communist China
China's Economic Reforms and Increasing Inequality
The Scale Inequality in Contemporary China
Inequality and Political and Migration Pressures
Conclusion
From the Paper
"In conclusion, the increasing levels of inequality in China - not only in terms of rural vs. urban, but also inland vs. coastal - present a clear and present threat to the legitimacy of the Communist government given its ideological origins in socialist egalitarianism. While the economic development of China and its opening to world trade has brought great wealth and development to parts of the country, other parts have suffered even more so. The geographic localization of this problem in rural/inland areas, as well as the discontent of many migrant workers in the urban areas, represents a disturbing prospect for the future of not only stable economic development in China, but for the continued rule of the Communist party and political stability in China as a whole."
| |
|
Economic Justice, 2003.
A look at the problem of economic inequality over the years and a review of the literature.
1,258 words (approx. 5.0 pages), 5 sources, MLA, $ 42.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper examines some of the current literature on the subject of ?economic justice? to look at both sides of the picture, identifies a few major issues, and draws conclusions from the review. It explains that if we look at the economic conditions in the present day world we would find that we are further from the ideal of economic justice than ever before. It shows how this is reflected in the rising inequality between the rich and the poor, both at the intra-country and inter-country levels ,and the crippling debt of the under-developed countries.
From the Paper
"Reflecting the intellectual divide on most political and economic issues, there are basically two diametrically opposite views on the subject of economic justice. This is not necessarily a bad thing as it enables one to examine alternate opinions, but it does have the drawback of creating confusion?it becomes hard to decipher fact from fiction as the opposing schools of thought tend to ?bend? arguments to suit their view-points. In any case, the rightist/ neo-liberal point of view holds that the present economic world order (represented by globalization and laissez faire economy, supported by the Bretton Wood institutions) is the path leading to global economic salvation. The leftist or alternate point of view propagates that the present economic order is promoting growing inequality between the rich and the poor and is the antithesis of ?economic justice.?"
| |
|
Globalization and Canadian Economics, 2002.
The impact of globalization on economic inequality and the role of the state in Canada.
1,400 words (approx. 5.6 pages), 8 sources, $ 53.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This time has also coincided with increasing globalization, which has placed an emphasis on cost control in the public as well as the private sector. The end result, of course, has not only been an attack on the welfare state, but also changes in the structure of employment and the ability of the state to control its national economy. In a general sense, this means that the topic of globalization and its impact on the nations of the world, their economies and their societies are issues that have received a great deal of attention in recent years. This impact will be the topic of analysis for this paper.
| |
|
Civil Rights AKA Economic Equality, 2000.
An look at how the leaders of the Civil Rights movement believed that racism was based on economics, and that the entire economic system of the United States and of the world was inherently flawed.
1,105 words (approx. 4.4 pages), 5 sources, $ 38.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
The Civil Rights movement of the 1960s was not a movement for equality in the social or political sense; rather, it was a movement to bring an end to economic inequality and exploitation by the elites. Common perception holds that the Civil Rights movement sought to gain certain political and social rights and equalities. Measures such as the Civil Rights Act and the Voting Rights Act reinforced such flawed perceptions. However, when the works of the leaders of the Civil Rights movement are consulted, it is discovered that they were seeking economic equality. They believed that the fundamental cause of racism was a flawed economic system. It is important to note that they did not believe that poverty in the traditional sense caused racism and inequality. They believed, especially King and Carmichael, that the entire economic system of the United States and of the world was inherently flawed. This essay explore? their arguments why racism was based on economics, why the system was flawed, and how they hoped to change the system.
| |
|
Democracy and Inequality in Latin America, 2002.
A look at whether democracy is possible in Latin America.
2,400 words (approx. 9.6 pages), 4 sources, $ 89.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper discusses whether or not democracy really exists, or is even possible, in Latin America in light of the acute social, political, and economic inequalities and institutional weaknesses that characterize most of the region. The paper discusses the main problem of inequality existing along economic, racial, gender, and regional lines. Because of this reality, economic growth and "free elections" do not necessarily translate into democracy for the average Latin American citizen.
| |
|
Economic Development Strategies of Developing Countries, 2002.
An examination of the economic and political results of the adoption of one of 3 different strategies: Structuralism, Neoliberalism, Marxism.
1,575 words (approx. 6.3 pages), 7 sources, $ 55.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
Examines economic & polotical results of adoption of one of 3 different strategies: Structuralism, Neoliberalism, Marxism. Focus on 3 countries: Cuba, Argentina, Chile. Describes the 3 strategy thories & how the 3 countries under consideration used them regarding economic growth & reduction of economic inequalities. Problems & outcomes.
From the Paper
"Since World War II, developing countries in the South have been provided with the option of adopting one of three different economic development strategies: structuralism, neoliberalism, and Marxism. The purpose of this essay is to examine the economic and political results engendered by each approach and to determine what these results suggest for future economic policy choices in the region. Three countries lend themselves to this analysis. Cuba, particularly since the overthrow of the Batista regime and the establishment of Castro's Marxist government, has pursued economic development along Marxist lines (Perez-Lopez, 1997). In Argentina, a structuralist economic order under Juan Peron gave way to a neoliberalist orientation (Smith, 1991). In Chile, a neoliberal experiment between 1974 and 1990 took place and this experiment has led to structural change in the national economy..."
| |
|
International Trade on Income Inequality, 2008.
This paper researches the effects of international trade, immigration and the decline of unionism on income inequality.
2,893 words (approx. 11.6 pages), 8 sources, APA, $ 85.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
America as the land of opportunity is a concept that has been around since the country's inception. Americans should have the economic opportunity that is associated with this general concept. As such, the topic of income inequality is of great importance. This paper explores the effects of international trade, immigration, and unionism on income inequality.
Outline:
Abstract
Introduction
Income Inequality
The Effects of International Trade on Income Inequality
The Effects of Immigration on Income Inequality
The Effects of the Decline of Unionism on Income Inequality
Is Income Inequality Getting a Bad Rap?
Conclusion
From the Paper
"Rising inequality and decreasing poverty could very well be a consistent feature of the New Economy. Rapid technological advancements have not only created great fortunes for a select few, but have also substantially improved the wages and quality of life for people at the lower end of the economic ladder. A better-educated society has also led to less poverty, while still increasing the income inequality gap, since those with college degrees have a wider spread of incomes. Although income inequality is disturbing, it is far better than poverty. More income inequality, with a faster growing economy, and less poverty is far more desirable than an economy with equal distribution of income but a high rate of poverty. This is not the first time in history that this blend of greater income inequality and reduced poverty has occurred."
| |
|
Growth vs. Income Inequality, 2004.
An empirical study of the relationship between economic openness and national income.
3,403 words (approx. 13.6 pages), 15 sources, MLA, $ 96.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper examines the extent to which openness, viewed as trade?s share of GDP, impacts the trade-off between inequality and economic performance. The paper finds a positive and statistically significant relationship between openness and growth, yet a positive and statistically insignificant relationship between openness and inequality. The first part of the paper summarizes and evaluates the theoretical background and previous empirical research. Next, the paper presents the conceptual models tested in the paper. This is followed by a discussion of the ideal data set and an overview of the actual data. Following this discussion, the paper expounds the actual regression for the models used and presents the regression results. Finally, the paper ends with a summary and concluding remarks.
From the Paper
"Economic theory going back to Adam Smith suggests that the greater the trade, in accordance with traditional trade theory, results in greater national income from specialization, according to Frankel and Romer (1999). Yet, several studies have found ambiguous relationships between these two measures. There are possible explanations of this, as if a country specializes in an industry that has low productivity gains, perhaps greater trade will not necessarily increase national income, but even decrease income relative to other trading countries that specialized in high productivity gaining industries. An example of high and low productivity gains industries are computers and agriculture. Yet, in general we would see that this is a special case and a positive relationship between openness and income is still predicted, and this is what is mostly seen in the empirical literature."
| |
|
?Discourse on the Origin of Inequality? by Rousseau, 2002.
This paper discusses Rousseau?s ?Discourse on the Origin of Inequality,? a philosophical work that explains how society came to be and how inequality emerged and existed in the society.
590 words (approx. 2.4 pages), 1 source, $ 21.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper discusses Jean Jacques Rousseau?s ?Discourse on the Origin of Inequality of Man?, that focuses on how man came to be different from other animals because of two characteristics: Pity and the need for self-preservation. The paper points out that a careful study of Rousseau?s work shows that man?s natural tendency for survival and self-achievement will drive him to want to dominate others, and that inequality will become the product of humankind?s selfish and self- achieving nature.
From the Paper
"Rousseau defends his primary claim about inequality by explaining how inequality came to be. Of course, Rousseau discusses the nature of man prior to the establishment of the society. Prior to Rousseau?s society, humankind is egalitarian in nature, and survival is only the main reason why people live (self-preservation). However, as time passes, and as man become more acquainted with other people, the need to achieve betterment, or perfectibility, arises; man thus aspire to attain superiority above the others (?In proportion as the human race grew more numerous, men's cares increased. The difference of soils, climate and seasons, must have introduced some differences in their manner of living?). Through this kind of thinking and objective, man becomes unfair individual, and the society that Rousseau talks about is created through the inequality of man."
|
|
|
